Dominasi Simbolik dalam Empat Novel Karya Taha Husayn
Abstract
This study aims to reveal the author's thoughts when looking at the education system in his country. He thought of Taha Husayn in his four novels, namely Syajarat al-Bu's, Al-Ayyam 1, Al-Ayyam 2, and Al-Ayyam 3. Researchers see the urgency of the study of the four novels to present a dispute between traditional and modern ideologies that are in the middle happen. To express this thought, researchers used Roland Barthes's semiotic approach and Pierce Bourdieou's symbolic dominance. The semiotics approach is used to uncover hidden ideologies in the sign system of a particular culture. Researchers found symbolic domination in various lines of Egyptian social life, including in the field of education. Also found is the battle between subjects who have cultural, economic, social, and symbolic capital in an arena for reproducing structures.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengungkap pemikiran sang pengarang ketika melihat sistem pendidikan di negaranya. Pemikiran Taha Husayn ini ia tuangkan dalam empat novel karangannya yaitu Syajarat al-Bu’s, Al-Ayyam 1, Al-Ayyam 2, dan Al-Ayyam 3. Peneliti melihat urgensi kajian terhadap keempat novel tersebut untuk menyajikan perseteruan antara ideologi tradisional dan modern yang tengah terjadi. Untuk mengungkap pemikiran tersebut, peneliti menggunakan pendekatan semiotika Roland Barthes dan dominasi simbolik Pierce Bourdieou. Pendekatan semiotika digunakan untuk menyingkap ideologi tersembunyi dalam sistem tanda pada kebudayaan tertentu. Peneliti menemukan adanya dominasi simbolik di berbagai lini kehidupan sosial masyarakat Mesir, termasuk di bidang pendidikan. Ditemukan juga pertarungan antara subjek yang memiliki kapital budaya, ekonomi, sosial, dan simbolik dalam satu arena untuk melakukan reproduksi struktur.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barthes, R. (2000). Elements of Semiology (translated by Annete Lavers and Colin Smith). New York: Hill and Wang
Barthes, R. (1991). Mythologies. (translated by Annette Lavers). New York: The Noonday Press
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a Social Critique of The Judgement of Taste (diterjemahkan oleh Richard Nice dari La Distinction: Critique Sociale du Jugement). USA: Harvard College and Routledge
Cachia, P. (1956). Ṭāhā Ḥusayn: his place in the Egyptian literary renaissance. ix, 260 pp., London: Licac & Co., Ltd., 30s. - Volume 21 Issue 2 - R.B. Serjeant.
Culler, J. (2001). Barthes: A Very Short Introduction. UK: Oxford University Press
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192801593.001.0001
Dajani, Z. R. (1987). The Egyptian Udaba and the crisis of Islam: A study of the Islamic thought of Taha Husayn, Muhammad Husayn Haykal, and 'Abbas Mahmud al-'Aqqad and its influence on Egyptian political, social and intellectual life. PhD thesis. SOAS University of London.
Haryatmoko. (2010). Dominasi Penuh Muslihat: Akar Kekerasan dan Diskriminasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Husayn, T. (1953). Syajarat al-Bu's. Kairo: Nadi Al-Qishah
Husayn, T. (1929). Al-Ayyam 1. Kairo
Husayn, T. (1940). Al-Ayyam 2. Kairo
Husayn, T. (1967). Al-Ayyam 3. Beirut
Marsot, A. L Al-Sayyid. (2007). A History of Egypt; From the Arab Conquest to the Present. USA: Cambridge University Press
Nehme, M G. (2003). Fear and Anxiety in the Arab World. USA: University Press of Florida
Noth, W. (1990). Handbook of Semiotics. USA: Indiana University Press
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv14npk46
Salloum, D. (1957). A Comparative Study of Taha Husain's Views and the Western Conception of Fiction. PhD thesis. SOAS University of London.
Smith, P. (2001). Cultural Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/kelasa.v15i1.86
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Kelasa Indexed By
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
@2019
KANTOR BAHASA PROVINSI LAMPUNG
Kompleks Gubernuran, Jalan Beringin II No. 40, Kec. Telukbetung Selatan, Bandarlampung, Lampung 35221
View My Stats